179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
atomly
To:
Date:
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 13:21:08 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] kid a vs. homogenic
Msg-Id:
<20001012132108.A14184@atomly.com>
In-Reply-To:
<F1562NSAW4eE2FGwQ2100001410@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0010.gz
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 11:29:50AM -0700, Ron Jeremy wrote:
quoted 7 lines Does it really matter? Does everything have to be broken up into some> Does it really matter? Does everything have to be broken up into some > little "label"? Isn't it suffice to say that it has a lot of electronic > music influences on it, and that it is one of the finest releases out right > now. > > Labels are for shite journalists that are too lazy to describe the music. Or > people trying to sell you something.
I agree completely.
quoted 2 lines Agreed. Whether they were listening to Aphex Twin or Billy Squier it doesn't> Agreed. Whether they were listening to Aphex Twin or Billy Squier it doesn't > really matter.
It would've if they would've covered "Stroke." :)
quoted 4 lines i wonder if they've even heard of "idm"...> >i wonder if they've even heard of "idm"... > > I'm sure they have heard the term "Intelligent" in regards to electronic > music. I think they probably read the press just like most of us.
Judging from the fact that Thom was charting Christoph de Babalon and the like, I think he knows some stuff about IDM. -- :: atomly :: atomly@atomly.com | atomly@atdot.org | atomly@curiousnetworks.com http://www.atomly.com | http://www.mp3.com/atomly --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org