179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Date:
Wed, 4 Oct 2000 22:06:17 EDT
Subject:
[idm] Kid A - Not IDM Enough....of course not
Msg-Id:
<ca.afbfb37.270d3c19@aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.0010.gz
<The revolution has already started. The fact that you can complain that Radiohead's new album isn't IDM-ENOUGH, and we all understand what you're talking about, should be proof enough.> To this point, I'd like ask how anyone could logically expect them to go much further into an IDM exploratory in their first attempt? I'm not sure how long Radiohead has been together, but you certainly don't just toss your guitars in the trash and expect to create a full-on piece of electronic genious. A talented rock band doesn't necessarily make a talented IDM group regardless of how fond they are of that style of music. Producing the music is a talent in itself that takes years of perfection and I think they should be applauded for how well they've done, if you are able to see Kid A as a debut album from a refound group. And that normally applies to the kids who start screwing around with their samplers and became musicians, not to rock bands with a number of releases under their belt. I read someone say something about their naive use of timestretching? Track the progression of their influences in Aphex and Ae. Their first releases were nowhere near as precise as the more recent ones. Who would've thought that tracks off of Analogue Bubblebath would turn into something like Bucephalus Bouncing Ball? And Autechre...I mean...come on......Cavity Job??? Radiohead have passed the first test as far as I'm concerned. Supposedly they have a bunch of other tracks on hold. Let the real judging begin with their sophmore IDM "type" release. tekdz9er --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org