179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Ron Jeremy
To:
,
Date:
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 09:28:19 PDT
Subject:
Re: [idm] Radiohead 00
Msg-Id:
<F326utJLtosJ3Ih7jtr0000a286@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0009.gz
Thanks for the Radiohead news! Since it isn't being popularly received on this list, that gives me hope that it will be a great lp!! When second rate artists like Kid606 & Funkstorung get good reviews around here, you really have to wonder about the standards on this list. It makes me laugh. Good one boys :) I guess someone has to buy it (or shovel it). Why is there even a discussion about IDM reaching or being accepted by the mainstream. That would just mean the music would have to erode and become watered down. It already has IMHO eroded with the influx of mediocre talents. And why would Radiohead enlist Kid 606 to do a remix when they could get anyone in the world? That would be pathetic!
quoted 9 lines From: "metacipher" <dep3@po.cwru.edu>>From: "metacipher" <dep3@po.cwru.edu> >though then where is the discussion in this? will the album >validate idm on/ fused with a major? is there anyone on the list who is >not >eager to listen to it? does the band dance to its own idm? can it be a >success by the idm standard if it is excellently piercing but not >innovative >in comparison to those artists of routine discussion? when will there >be >a kid606 remix?
_________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org