179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
component
To:
Date:
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 22:36:22 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] IDM in the US mainstream
Msg-Id:
<004301c01c62$3f755240$a7bfdfcf@oemcomputer>
Mbox:
idm.0009.gz
There really is NO WAY that you can call a major label like Jive an independant label. Those fuckers are making millions off selling their musical version of ex-lax. Rob component records www.mindstorm.com/component ----- Original Message ----- From: Marc 3 Poirier <mpoirier@virtu.sar.usf.edu> To: <idm@hyperreal.org> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 9:56 PM Subject: Re: [idm] IDM in the US mainstream
quoted 10 lines Yea, Kent pretty much hit it on the head here. As recently as the 60's,> > >Yea, Kent pretty much hit it on the head here. As recently as the 60's, > >"independent" labels were able to get singles into the top 10, but now > >only the majors (Universial, EMI, Warner, Sony and BMG) can get decent > >distribution much less hits. > > Jive Records (Britney Spears, Backstreet Boys, *nsync, R. Kelly, > etc.) is independent, actually. Brings the question into my mind of just > what the hell independent means, though. >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org