179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Irene McC
To:
,
Date:
Fri, 26 May 2000 10:51:25 +0200
Subject:
Re: [idm] biosphere- old vs new and stuff.
Msg-Id:
<392E572D.12609.3D5AA7@localhost>
In-Reply-To:
<200005251458.JAA00133@cliffy.lmtas.lmco.com>
Mbox:
idm.0005.gz
On 25 May 2000, Ernesto Ikerd wrote re Re: [idm] biosphere- old vs new and:
quoted 3 lines Patashnik is more techno-ish than ambient because its older> Patashnik is more techno-ish than ambient because its older > material. Its not bad, but if you are looking for Substrata you > won't find it.
Funny, strange and weird, isn't it - but there's no accounting for taste :-) Personally I prefer the older Biosphere (Microgravity, Patashnik) to the much lauded Substrata - which left me cold and unfortunately unmoved after all the hoopla and hype it generated. np : the sound of a huge cement mixer down the driveway... I * --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org