179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Vague Terrain
To:
Date:
Sat, 13 May 2000 00:00:25 -0700
Subject:
[idm] better Riz than "chick"
Msg-Id:
<l03130302b542adec34a3@[216.7.176.4]>
Mbox:
idm.0005.gz
"dude. pointing out that someone referred to as a 'he' is in actuality is a she is not misogynistic. pointing out that a person is attractive is not misogynistic." While I shouldn't speak for others, I have to say that the original post wasn't arguing that it was misogynist to identify Riz' gender. The word in question wasn't "woman", it was "chick" and if you can't figure out the connotative difference, then YOU'RE the "moron" in this picture. And no, pointing out that a person is attractive isn't *necessarily* misogynistic. But in a sexist climate in which women's art-making tends to get referenced with their looks in ways that men's art-maiking rarely is, to uncritically perpetuate that association is to make a comment which, if not sexist in its intention, is nontheless sexist in its effect. How many posts on IDM have you seen where Bernd Friedmann's fetching cheekbones or Rob Brown's brooding good looks are the issue? later "dude". Drew --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org