179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
bsalter
To:
Date:
Sat, 10 Jul 99 14:46:18 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) re: exp. time sigs
Msg-Id:
<E113241-0005oy-00@beaver.slip.net>
Mbox:
idm.9907.gz
quoted 6 lines most of the 3/4/waltz-time that you hear in pop or dance is really 6/12.>most of the 3/4/waltz-time that you hear in pop or dance is really 6/12. >if you listen, the phrasing isn't classic waltz (ONE-two-three; >ONE-two-three). >it's more like: >ONE-two-three-four-five-six-SEVEN-eight-nine-ten-eleven-twelve. >
the time signature 6/12 does not exist! The bottom number is always a multiple of two (or sometimes '1'). but it sounds like you're describing 6/8...
quoted 7 lines there's a big difference.>there's a big difference. > >even the few waltzy pieces that surface (like some early Cocteau Twins >numbers or Chapterhouse's "Then We'll Rise") are really in 6/12. > >i'd challenge anyone to come up with an example of 'new' music in true 3/4. >
FSOL's 'Far Out Son of Lung' is very clearly in 3/4 (but far from a waltz in tempo & rhytmic feel...) -B ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Brian Salter bsalter@slip.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~