179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
SWEET VERNAL
To:
Date:
Wed, 7 Jul 1999 22:55:02 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
(idm) oldschool timestretching
Msg-Id:
<l03130302b3a988066ea3@[205.243.134.52]>
Mbox:
idm.9907.gz
quoted 1 line henrik.s@2.sbbs.se Subject: (idm) oldschool timestretching?> henrik.s@2.sbbs.se Subject: (idm) oldschool timestretching?
quoted 1 line something that's been prying on my mind...>something that's been prying on my mind...
quoted 4 lines when jungle was new and exiting (circa 1994) there was a lot of "staccato">when jungle was new and exiting (circa 1994) there was a lot of "staccato" >timestretching going on, i.e. "g-g-g-a-a-a-ng-ng-ng-s-s-s-t-t-t-a-a-a" (shy >fx & gunsmoke), i suppose due to bad timestretching software.how does one >go about >getting that effect today?
most of the timestretching of that era' (and in the present) was done with good ole' samplers! the Akai's were used quite a lot then. there are a lot of software-based timestretching programs out there (which vary a lot in quality). timestretching is used all the time in re-mixes or production that requires a part(s) of a song to extend a bit longer or to be shortened. the efx you are aware of were actually accomplished by people "abusing" the feature to get the desired effect. _____________________________________ ---------------------------------------------~ Curt King cking@xnet.com COLUMBIA AUDIO Chicago,IL.USA.EARTH "Taste is the enemy of art" _____________________________________ ----------------------------------------------~