179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Wenger
To:
david turgeon , little miss trinitron
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 17 Jun 1999 18:10:27 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) idim: intelligent desert island music?
Msg-Id:
<005401beb8e4$4d57b340$03cfb0c2@GraVoice>
Mbox:
idm.9906.gz
I think some people are being WAAAAAAAAY to fuckin picky here! I can understand what David is trying to get to, sort of a listing of essential cant-be-without electronic / idm / good music...for god's sake have a bit a fun now and again, not every post has to be so serious does it? After some of the shit thats been posted since the already infamous Ae (was it them - wasn't them, who gives a toss!) post getting back to the music is whats called for. Heres what I couldn't do without... 1. Polyon Window - Surfing On The Sine Waves 2. Global Communication - 76.14 3. Sabres Of Paradise - Sabresonic 4. The Orb - Ultraworld Excursions, The Aubrey mixes 5. My Skam vinyl (can that all count as one? PLEEEEASE!!!) 6. The Frighteners (its a film - SORRY...) 7. A KFC Zinger burger meal. this is tough but theres my best shot. nice idea David - wrong set of people to try it on. Wenger (as in Arsene) Boy np - with my baby -----Original Message----- From: david turgeon <eerie@mnemonic.net> To: little miss trinitron <artist@sub-con-geo.demon.co.uk> Cc: idm@hyperreal.org <idm@hyperreal.org> Date: 18 June 1999 17:28 Subject: Re: (idm) idim: intelligent desert island music?
quoted 2 lines if i /were/ forced to choose 10 records to be stranded on a desert island>> if i /were/ forced to choose 10 records to be stranded on a desert island >> with, i would probably only choose one, or maybe two, that fit within
your
quoted 17 lines critera for 'idm'. no, actually, i wouldn't take ten records, i'd take>> critera for 'idm'. no, actually, i wouldn't take ten records, i'd take a >> laptop! > >hell yeah, no shit, which is why i specified that they need to be idm >only, just to get a more specific take on the did thing. what i _was_ >hoping for is a genuine listing of albums that are usually considers >idm, or that the poster considers as idm. but i don't think i should >expect any such thing now, seeing as the concern is clearly elsewhere. > >should have known better i guess! or should have posted a page-long >disclaimer on WHY exactly those have to be idm even though no one would >_really_ pick 10 idm records as their desert island discs. but who >cares. i can see this is going nowhere already, sorry for trying! > >-- >david turgeon at http://www.notype.com >