Well, it would have been t'anks, if I was contracting the work "thanks,"
which I wasn't; opting instead for the shortened "playing with tanks."
But your analysis was most appropriate and pertinent to the content of the
post.
Vanessa
*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
*--* "Master, I have done wrong. *--*
*--* I will go to Malaysia and start a new life." *--*
*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 Crtrdge003@aol.com wrote:
quoted 13 lines In a message dated 6/10/99 2:53:29 PM Mountain Daylight Time,> In a message dated 6/10/99 2:53:29 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
> vblock@students.uiuc.edu writes:
>
> > 'tanks,
>
> wouldn't that be "t'anks" instead of "'tanks".. afterall it's the H you're
> replacing. Just trying to keep up that tight idm atmosphere with a little bit
> of annoying grammar over analysis. The emphasis being more on the anal than
> the ysis.
>
> Spank you,
> Aaron
>