179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Tom Millar
To:
Hrvatski
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 09 Jun 1999 22:26:23 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) k&d/ mixing software
Msg-Id:
<375F224C.E6658DBE@unix.cas.utk.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9906.gz
Well, I was reading about Pro Tools DJ mixes and realized I can't come up with the hate for a "DJ" who uses DSP to mix tracks. So I can't really argue against someone using samples or samplers either, because this is more or less the same thing. In fact, the more I thought about it, the more I think I'd really enjoy it if I heard a sample from something of mine stuck in someone else's track. My dislike of samplers stems more or less from the innate fear I have that if I go and buy one for myself my music will immediately descend into conceptual in-joke hell and wank crap. Now I've used my computer for such much remanipulation and noisemaking I'm thinking about getting a sampler anyway, mostly for utility purposes, but what's the difference? What people have said is generally true; the tool/design matters little compared to the idea or feeling of the output. So fuck it; I'm never going to evangelize the sampler (a la Matthew Herbert) but there's no reason not to like it. Hell, I love Amon Tobin! Tom Disclaimer: none of this makes the chembros any more palatable.