179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Alex Reynolds
To:
Date:
Tue, 20 Apr 1999 02:00:44 -0400
Subject:
(idm) randomized thoughts on idm, 'pi' and hollywood
Msg-Id:
<l03130303b341bf8331d2@[209.122.210.125]>
In-Reply-To:
<19990420025542.29957.qmail@hyperreal.org>
Mbox:
idm.9904.gz
watched pi a few weekends ago with my fifteen-year old brother. he liked the choice of music, but didn't like much else about the film, calling it weird, silly, pretentious. myself, i liked it better the first time around. watching it again, i got the feeling i was in the standard-grade independent film festival, where the artiste/director repeatedly cuts to odd-angle, poorly-lit shots and grainy film to divert your attention from the overacting. even with the music, the atmosphere was lost on videotape. now whenever i drive my brother anywhere and i'm playing any electronic music in the car, he puts his index finger to his temple and starts making drilling noises. it's embarassing. it's irritating. i get concerned when my sibling comes back from watching 'the matrix' and says he now likes techno, having heard propellerheads, rob zombie, and prodigy. i also feel like exercising elder-monkey privileges and smacking him upside the head. the youth of today starve for movie soundtracks with quality electronic music -- idm needs better role models in the cinematic community. 'pi' is an okay flick, but i prefer 'clockwork orange' as electronic music's ambassador to the silver screen. with a kubrick piece, at least the pretension and elitism can be rationalized. where is our generation's wendy carlos? __________________________________________________________________________ Alex Reynolds E reynolda@sas.upenn.edu UPenn : SAS Computing : Biology Dist Support V +1 215 573 2818 http://www.sas.upenn.edu/biology/ F +1 215 898 8780 'The central message of Buddhism is not "every man for himself"!' -- Wanda