179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Alex Reynolds
To:
Date:
Mon, 22 Feb 1999 22:40:19 -0500
Subject:
(idm) planet of the humans
Msg-Id:
<l03130301b2f7c8afe4a7@[130.91.128.110]>
In-Reply-To:
<l03110703b2f781447114@[130.91.128.35]>
Mbox:
idm.9902.gz
quoted 7 lines Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 21:12:04 GMT>Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 21:12:04 GMT >From: control@mcsi.net (clint nixon) >Subject: Re: (idm) Aphex Twin- "Window Licker" >... >gosh now this sounds like a post i read when AE's LP5 came out. >somebody turned the album into this Life and Death struggle, when its >just music and you either listen and dislike or like to listen.
gosh now maybe we should go old-old-skool and climb back up the trees and start throwing our shit at one another again for mind-numbing kicks; maybe go back to banging rocks together. after all, it's just music. why bother having an opinion in the first place? i don't know if i said lp5 was a pay per view special on Life vs Death, but i did and still think that there is special meaning to the music. i don't believe there's any reason to have to apologize for having an opinion, as long as it is clearly labeled as such. (and it was) music/art/reality is what you make of it and life is just too short; might as well get something out of it, even if it's likely that nothing is 'there' and that i'm just a deluded monkey. "making a dollar outta fifteen cents," -a. extra credit (for advanced idm monkeys only): how statistically absurd is it that our universe comes together in such a way that wealthy, privileged apes with email accounts and lots of records get to bicker over whether an opinion held over a piece of music is valid or not? __________________________________________________________________________ Alex Reynolds E reynolda@sas.upenn.edu UPenn : SAS Computing : Biology Dist Support V +1 215 573 2818 http://www.sas.upenn.edu/biology/ F +1 215 898 8780 'The central message of Buddhism is not "every man for himself"!' -- Wanda