179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
little miss trinitron
To:
Date:
Fri, 05 Feb 1999 19:32:15 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: music/math
Msg-Id:
<36bb4436.6593091@post.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.SGI.3.96A.990205132210.583647B-100000@umbc9.umbc.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9902.gz
On Fri, 5 Feb 1999 13:41:30 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
quoted 5 lines Music IS mathematics to me, I think music is a billion trillion equations>Music IS mathematics to me, I think music is a billion trillion equations >with just a smattering of random number generators feeding values to the >equations, which would be things like the weather, or your mood, or >relative degree of intoxication -- whatever influences your songwriting >process.
i wonder what coltrane would have to say about all this.
quoted 2 lines i'm not saying autechre couldn't have been boring. most likely they just>i'm not saying autechre couldn't have been boring. most likely they just >needed more equations.
what they need is to get out of their rut and produce something inspiring instead of mind-numbing. their ideal of sterility and precision is flawed and pretentious. bernard parmegiani really did do it better, and with much more imagination, 12-15 years ago. some day they'll break and realise that the convoluted path they've taken was mostly a waste of time.
quoted 2 lines face it, if you use any kind of sequencer, your music CAN be transcribed>face it, if you use any kind of sequencer, your music CAN be transcribed >into an equation.
maybe music can be broken down into a series of numbers. in that sense, music /is/ mathematics. but if that's all you get from music, then what's the point? motto for today - the medium isn't the message!