179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Nate Harrison \[Toshok Laboratories\]
To:
Michael Upton
Cc:
Decent lies culminating
Date:
Sun, 31 Jan 1999 00:26:04 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) re: oval...
Msg-Id:
<Pine.BSI.3.95.990131001856.20288B-100000@we1.web-elite.com>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.BSF.4.02A.9901311628010.21891-100000@tao.sans.vuw.ac.nz>
Mbox:
idm.9901.gz
So what was the music that doesn't dated again? What music does not sound dated? I can't really think of any actually. I think the concept of music sounding 'dated' is a little relative and probematic... my .02 Nate On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Michael Upton wrote:
quoted 25 lines On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Miau-Miau International wrote:> On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Miau-Miau International wrote: > > | Joshua Reuven wrote: > | >well i'm sure i'll get strung up for saying this... > | >but in my humble opinion, i belive that oval blows autechre and chain > | >reaction out of the water. they cannot hold a candle to oval. > | > | i think 20 or 30 years from now, oval will stiil sound revolutionary, > | while a lot of other stuff popular on this list will sound dated, like, > | "oh, that's what they thought was cool back in 1999" > > I personally think it will sound just as dated. > Hopefully it will also still sound cool though, > like, well, Douglas Lilburn, but he's an NZ > composer who would mean nothing... but I'm sure > everyone has their heroes from back 20 or 30 years > ago. > > Michael > > ____________________________________________ > "His eyes are TV cameras" > http://www.vuw.ac.nz/~michael/jj.html > >