179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Mark Kolmar
To:
IDM List
Date:
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 19:56:34 -0600 (CST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) CD lengths (was Matador)
Msg-Id:
<Pine.GSO.4.02.9901261949380.2459-100000@typhoon.xnet.com>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.3.96.990126144655.11551A-100000@htr-132.tx.symbio.net>
Mbox:
idm.9901.gz
On Tue, 26 Jan 1999 daniel@eliteware.com wrote:
quoted 1 line [....] after all it is only 45 min long..> [....] after all it is only 45 min long..
I'm curious if many listmembers consider a 45 minute album too short by definition, or if 35-45 minutes can be just the right length sometimes. It used to be that 45 minutes was pretty long for an album. Some CDs overstay their welcome IMO. What do you think? I remember the fuss over the RDJ album, though as I remember that one is more like 30 minutes (not including "Boy/Girl"). --Mark __ Burning Rome : SENSELESS CD on Mindfield Records MindCD03 Cathartium 14 > Distributed by Dutch East India Trading, Com Four, and Carrot Top < < http://www.xnet.com/~mkolmar/BurningRome > < MP3 & RealAudio tracks >