179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Chris.Hilker
To:
Ironic Dance Music
Date:
Wed, 6 Jan 1999 17:23:19 -0800
Subject:
RE: (idm) RE: Poll chat/Low Res/Mannequin
Msg-Id:
<l03130301b2b9b6747147@[207.240.169.200]>
In-Reply-To:
<000a01be39a9$73ee35c0$de1011ac@insite5>
Mbox:
idm.9901.gz
quoted 1 line . at tops only a little over 10% of the list voted in the poll.>. at tops only a little over 10% of the list voted in the poll.
This has been true every year the poll has taken place. If anything, this year's 12.56% participation is better than usual.
quoted 4 lines . the categories lead people to vote based on best of genre. which>. the categories lead people to vote based on best of genre. which >immediately means those most typical of the genre will tend to get higher >placing. this is like dog breeders who produce pure bred idiots, when >everybody knows that mongrels are smarter.
So... how is Pole's album typical of House or Techno? I'm all for getting rid of the genre categories, as I pointed out before the poll began. But most of the requests I've seen have been for more categories, rather than fewer.
quoted 1 line . there are too many good comps for only 1 vote.>. there are too many good comps for only 1 vote.
Eligible comps named in first-round balloting: 24 Eligible chillout albums named: 36 Eligible drum & bass albums named: 26 Eligible house or techno albums named: 29 I think you (or someone else) made the same claim about all the great compilations that supposedly came out last year just after first-round voting started, but the results just don't bear that out. If anything, the Chillout category would be first in line for expansion, if I had any intention of expanding the first-round voting in a category (I don't). C. -- Chris.Hilker (cspot@hyperreal.org)