179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Irene McC
To:
,
Date:
Wed, 6 Jan 1999 08:39:01 +0200
Subject:
Re: (idm) why mask should be bootlegged
Msg-Id:
<E0zxmco-0001tr-00@smtp03.iafrica.com>
In-Reply-To:
<19990105155727.18742.qmail@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.9901.gz
On 5 Jan 99, Simon Walley wrote:
quoted 1 line & I don't think MASK is running a label well.> >& I don't think MASK is running a label well.
quoted 2 lines So? Its not for you to say. They can run their label any damn way they> So? Its not for you to say. They can run their label any damn way they > want. Don't like it? Start up your own
Naaah, I can't go with that argument. This list is a forum for comments just like that : it's a place for people to express their opinions. Even *if* you start your own label, it still doesn't help you get hold of obscure stuff off some 'badly' run label, does it? I, for one, haven't seen a single MASK / SKAM release here in South Africa. Luckily I've managed to hear some of their stuff via MP3's or obliging traders and although some of the music is *essential IDM*, it still doesn't warrant idiotic prices (imo). But as long as there are people who will pay 'what the market will hold', then these ridiculous auctions will continue. Who's to say? I *