179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
wells
To:
Chris.Hilker , Ironic Dance Music
Date:
Thu, 06 Aug 1998 16:19:13 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good.
Msg-Id:
<3.0.3.32.19980806161913.007e5820@titan.vcu.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<l03130302b1efbc1dbd8b@[4.6.170.158]>
Mbox:
idm.9808.gz
At 01:05 PM 8/6/98 -0700, Chris.Hilker wrote:
quoted 11 lines there is more to making the music than sticking a few patch leads in>>there is more to making the music than sticking a few patch leads in >>and clicking up a row of bars in cubase. it's more than likely that >>gescom / disjecta gave her technical assistance to create the sounds, >>and program her arrangments in the tracks. not just being used as a >>sample source - that's ridiculous! > >Funny how this is exactly what Bjork gets trashed all over this list >for doing, while Chantal gets full props. > >Double standard? >
i think it's because Chantal's music (or, rather, AE & disjecta's music with chantal's blathering) is 100x more interesting than most things Bjork has claimed to have done. but, yeah.. double standard nonetheless. at least chantal isn't some moron halfwit who prances around pretending to be a fairy or mystic or some other annoying from-the-darkwoode-forest-fantasy-type-thing. that's got to count for something - wells oliver / s0ewoliv@titan.vcu.edu / http://mute.simplenet.com