179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
GamePrg.
To:
IDM
Date:
Thu, 09 Jul 1998 20:05:44 EST4EDT
Subject:
RE: (idm) it takes the physical....
Msg-Id:
<yam7494.2241.130966496@dial-relay.mail.digex.net>
In-Reply-To:
<199807090845.JAA01523@gateway1.sema.co.uk>
Mbox:
idm.9807.gz
On Thursday, 09-Jul-98, WARD Giles wrote [about RE: (idm) it takes the physical....]:
quoted 5 lines Hmm.. IMO BoC are very accomplished but nothing amazingly new or>Hmm.. IMO BoC are very accomplished but nothing amazingly new or >different. AFX on the other hand nearly always pulls off a new >technique in every track. BoC are like a marginally updated version of >1994. I like them, but I reckon if they start a BoC type genre we'll be >going backwards. One is enough! Don't do it kids!
well of course.. One is enough is what I mean. BoC seem to be doing some fabulous triphop that is also melodic and just plain gorgeous.. I *LOVE* Aquarius. It's like what Panasonic makes.. You don't see everybody and his brother making Panasonic style music.. I love Panasonic, but I think if other people started making a Panasonic type genre it would get old/lame real fast. I mean, people should make the music they feel like making, but I mean, you can't deny that a lot these drill'n'bass ppl are jumping on a bandwagon, even if sub-conciously. __ __\ \ / /_\ \ 1cQ<->uIN \_____/ 1.3777993 "..in whatever you do, if you can't break new ground, what's the point?" - James Cameron