179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Ross Balmer
To:
IDM
Date:
Tue, 21 Mar 2000 18:45:26 -0000
Subject:
Re: (idm) why vinyl?
Msg-Id:
<1c0d01bf9365$a26f3400$7801010a@tuimedia.co.uk>
Mbox:
idm.0003.gz
I don't believe that at all. I won't argue in favour of Microsoft fatware (although if you threw enough hardware at it...) but surely it could be done on Linux just as easily. Ross ----- Original Message ----- From: laerm <laerm@voicenet.com> To: <idm@hyperreal.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 6:38 PM Subject: Re: (idm) why vinyl?
quoted 22 lines On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Ross Balmer wrote:> On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Ross Balmer wrote: > > > I'm a big lover of digital sound (especially since I don't possess a > > turntable) but I have to admit I think that dj-ing with digital > > formats is far inferior to vinyl. This looks like a good solution. I > > suspect it works by using a record with a steadily increasing or > > decreasing tone so that the computer can always work out where the > > needle has been placed. But why have they only released it for BeOS?? > > only BeOs can handle the data processing operations like this require. > > * > #### > a disturbance in a system. #### > laerm. @voicenet.com ##:# > icq 5562209 hush - may i ask you all for silence? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org