179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
laerm
To:
Date:
Tue, 21 Mar 2000 13:38:44 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) why vinyl?
Msg-Id:
<Pine.SOL.4.04.10003211338130.12269-100000@unix01>
In-Reply-To:
<1bf501bf9361$3e289120$7801010a@tuimedia.co.uk>
Mbox:
idm.0003.gz
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Ross Balmer wrote:
quoted 6 lines I'm a big lover of digital sound (especially since I don't possess a> I'm a big lover of digital sound (especially since I don't possess a > turntable) but I have to admit I think that dj-ing with digital > formats is far inferior to vinyl. This looks like a good solution. I > suspect it works by using a record with a steadily increasing or > decreasing tone so that the computer can always work out where the > needle has been placed. But why have they only released it for BeOS??
only BeOs can handle the data processing operations like this require. * #### a disturbance in a system. #### laerm. @voicenet.com ##:# icq 5562209 hush - may i ask you all for silence? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org