179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Heatsink
To:
Luke Keenan ,
Date:
Wed, 3 Jun 1998 19:24:24 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) vvm/speedranch
Msg-Id:
<01bd8f1c$d5d4ef00$9d90a6c3@DEFAULT>
Mbox:
idm.9806.gz
-----Original Message----- From: Luke Keenan <lukek@insight-media.co.uk> To: idm@hyperreal.org <idm@hyperreal.org> Date: 03 June 1998 00:44 Subject: (idm) vvm/speedranch
quoted 5 lines Map One: contaminated by technique - by members of this parish of>Map One: contaminated by technique - by members of this parish of >course. Theres a high standard throughout, and there's enjoyment to >be had, but its all reminiscent/derivative of the well known. Its >easily said, but I've heard aphex twin, and autechre, and they are >difficult to improve upon. So why try?
Um...Stuart, help!! I think this was a point Adam raised in his review, that some/most of the tracks were similar to or heavily-influenced by more well known artists. As I can only speak for myself and not the other guys on the CD, I`ll say that I wasn`t trying to improve on any artist`s previous work, but rather to make *mine* the best it can be. No-one can help or choose what influences they have, and while I`m not going to blatantly steal from another track, I`ll readily use techniques pioneered by others in my own tracks. How original is the Aphex Twin anyway? Not very. And if, by drawing influences from others I actually branch off and come up with something different/original, then great. Chances are, if you spend all your time trying to come up with something totally original, you`ll end up with something totally shite. I`ll stand by every one of those tracks on Map One and defend them as utterly valid, thoughtful and release-worthy tracks. Some of them I might even think of as <gasp> pretty original. Anyway, it`s nine quid for 16 tracks, so what are you moaning about? :-) <---HEATsink--->