179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Irene McC
To:
Date:
Wed, 5 Nov 1997 17:49:02 +0200
Subject:
(idm) finally played plaid
Msg-Id:
<E0xT7YE-0005t2-00@relay01.iafrica.com>
In-Reply-To:
<19971105115007.10762.qmail@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.9711.gz
On 5 Nov 97, Chip wrote: Re: (idm) RDJ- Yuck.:
quoted 3 lines new plaid, which i really like so far, by the way. myopia is just> new plaid, which i really like so far, by the way. myopia is just > great. i love the way the vocals towards the end go from sounding > ominous to uplifting. need to go listen some more.
Agreed : I got mine yesterday and though I've listened through it about 4 times over, it's not enough for all the diverse bits to sink in. I do agree with previous posts that have commented on the diversity (or 'patchiness' in the more derogatory reviews) of this album, but it certainly keeps the listener on your toes because, unlike say, Jimpster - where you know what you're getting from track 1 right through to the end - this is not consistent in genre or sound. Which I don't think is a bad thing - it's certainly varied and lots of it is excellent. On a different note : could some of our graphic designers please advise me (in private) regarding the semiotic relevance and significance of the rubber gloves on the Plaid cover? I can follow that there are two gloves (ie. 2 hands - not "three") and then there's the repeat reference on the foldout inside sleeve of the yellow rubber glove. Does this portray the sound of the music? Must one handle with care? Is it corrosive / allergenic / dangerous? Huh? I * np : Dif Juz - Extractions