179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
drew mcdowall
To:
Random Junk
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 13 Oct 1997 22:04:44 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) coldcut on rule 43?
Msg-Id:
<l03102800b06836cc2de1@[194.222.230.218]>
In-Reply-To:
<199710131752.KAA21544@hudsucker.gamespot.com>
Mbox:
idm.9710.gz
quoted 7 lines interesting to hear his side of the story. i talked to a guy at>interesting to hear his side of the story. i talked to a guy at >Nothing who said they could have cleared it but they were going to >take the money out of luke's royalties to pay for it and luke said >he'd rather have the money. > >-- >Jon Drukman jsd@gamespot.com SpotMedia Communications
the money for sample clearance always comes out of the artists royalties,if you have a lot of samples to clear it could end up costing more than your likely to see in returns.it could be that luke vibert couldn't avoid that hard financial reality. -drew np:pierre henry-messe pour la temps present(this is so completely brilliant and it's 30 years old)