quoted 2 lines without björk and her zillions of dollars, a lot of her 'starving'>> without björk and her zillions of dollars, a lot of her 'starving'
>> collaborators would be nothing.quoted 2 lines They'd be 'nothing?' Nothing in what sense? They'd be musicians and>They'd be 'nothing?' Nothing in what sense? They'd be musicians and
>artists. I'd hardly call that 'nothing.'
nothing to all those people who arent exactly 'connoisseurs' in idm, like
you fresh.
bjork's terms lay more in the education field. she has enough good taste to
pick good collaborators that get known through her music. a lot of people
got led into idm by listening to björk, and shes probably what made YOU
develop a more 'exotic' taste.
quoted 4 lines Sorry if this thread is annoying for some of the listmembers, but I>Sorry if this thread is annoying for some of the listmembers, but I
>think as we begin to see more collaborations such as the things bjork
>has been doing we're going to be having to deal with these questions of
>authorship and who is really responsible for the music more and more.
oh urgently we will... what are you? the saviour of idm? its not like
bjork's destroying your precious genre or anything, she's publicising it. i
think how she chooses to work is not as evil as all those annoying
half-assed side projects that just use their notoriety like mike&rich and
stuff.
and yeah, how are we supposed to deal with the ultra-generic transformers
and stolen anime from the rephlex page, and all the stolen british
expressions in your vocabulary? those are authorship issues too...
you get real now,
jif