179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Hess Hodge
To:
Date:
Tue, 26 Aug 1997 01:13:39 -0600 (MDT)
Subject:
CDR was: (idm) Threads mk.II
Msg-Id:
<Pine.GSO.3.95.970826010813.9869A-100000@rintintin.Colorado.EDU>
In-Reply-To:
<970826025451_17569462@emout08.mail.aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.9708.gz
On Tue, 26 Aug 1997 PUCKERED1@aol.com wrote:
quoted 5 lines I heard that music CDR's aren't that great because most of the time they> I heard that music CDR's aren't that great because most of the time they > skip-sometimes they don't... very inconsistent... extremely sensative, etc. > I heard this is only with the computer CDR's, not with the home audio CDR's. > (which use totally different techniques to achieve the same thing.) > but this is just what I hear..... true?
I have a CDR of a certain to-remain-unnamed rarity (thanks Gil) that was burned using a marantz CD recorder onto a KAO brand CDR disc. This was a year ago and I have not had any trouble with the recording at all. I am very happy with it... ;) I do know, however that the burner I was using was *very* picky about the brand of CDR disc it would work with... hess