179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
wesley@interaccess.com
To:
Tim Fothergill F. Ciencias Dpto. Biologia
Cc:
idm
Date:
Mon, 25 Aug 1997 19:41:43 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Propellerhead...or the Cool-io Synth
Msg-Id:
<Pine.GSO.3.96.970825192900.1067B-100000@yin.interaccess.com>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.GSO.3.96.970825202556.7935B-100000@abello>
Mbox:
idm.9708.gz
quoted 7 lines Music is no longer the exclusive property of the formally educated.> > Music is no longer the exclusive property of the formally educated. > > Have to say that I don't think music has ever been the exclusive property > of the formally educated, just the means to reproduce if faithfully in the > written form. There are many folk traditions that involve father passing > music to son via physically showing them how to play things, very informal > education.
I thought about what it was that I was trying to say for a long time before I wrote the above line, and I think I failed to get my point across. What I meant is that it has traditionally been frowned upon for people to declare themselves musicians without having some sort of training on their instruments. Just as an overwhelming majority of Americans and Europeans would be upset if I declared myself a piano player without being able to read music, play songs, etc., I would imagine that Africans and Chinese people would be similarly chagined were I to declare myself a kora or pipa player. None the more clearly yours, Paul wesley2interaccess.com