179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Philip Sherburne
To:
'idm@hyperreal.org'
Date:
Thu, 2 Mar 2000 13:41:41 -0800
Subject:
(idm) bitching about what is or is not on-topic
Msg-Id:
<2C61C8FFB164D311B0D500902786F1040196A35F@SAGAN>
Mbox:
idm.0003.gz
The, to my mind, curmudgeonly position that "Jim O'Rourke is more suited to the ambient list, please take it elsewhere" is certainly crying out for flames (and I almost wonder if it's not intentionally flame-bait). I could bring up plenty of recent instances of non-IDM that got discussed around here, from Jochem Paap's ambient CDs to the agonizing debacle of D'Angelo to the never-ending references back to hip hop (a critical plank in IDM's platform for "keeping it real" -- how many fucking times will I have to read Booth & Brown talk about how they were into electro and breaking, way way back in the day? But I digress). In any case, what I find most interesting about the demand to segregate ambient topics from IDM topics (even when the label at issue is, as in the case of the O'Rourke remix, arch-IDM label Warp) is that IDM was born largely out of the chillout rooms of rave/club culture. Its roots are really linked with ambient's development. And yet somehow there's an assumption now that IDM consists only of crunch'n'bleep DSP fuckery, and all the other influences be damned. Ah well, here's to sheltered childhoods. Philip Sherburne --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org