179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Steven T Lammers
To:
Cc:
Date:
Sun, 13 Jul 1997 00:15:36 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) jedis vs. prodigy
Msg-Id:
<199707130415.AAA23235@pilot12.cl.msu.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<970712035838_1623183963@emout03.mail.aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.9707.gz
..I believe the legal cutoff is 11 notes. -Horsepower ========================================================>
quoted 19 lines unwritten ethical subtexts of developing and/or> >>unwritten ethical subtexts of developing and/or > >>experimental/underground > >>cultures is that its ok to borrow, quote, or sample one another as > >>long as > >>no one's profiting any more from it than anyone else. > > > >ethical, but not necessarily legal... > > Which raises the question "how far is too far?" I think everybody on this > list supports the concept of sampling to one extent or another. What if IDM > got to rewrite copyright law? To what extent should we respect intellectual > property? Is there some arbitrary acceptable sample length? Does the sample > need to be messed up/rearranged to be used? What compensation should artists > get for the use of their work as samples? When can their work be used with > or without their permission? When does something become public domain? And > I don't want what the law is now--what do you think the law should be? > > Sam >
--