My intention here wasn't to start a who's better or more important than
who fight. I just thought we could consider each other as equals (ie
there isn't one country that's domestic and all the rest are foreigners).
I wasn't pointing a finger at anyone in particular, this just happened to
be an example that reminded me (I may be a bit testy because of the
throat infection someone at work just gave me). I was trying to illustrate
a general point instead of what a particular person said.
I realise the list is based in the US, but the majority of the music
discussed here is from the UK thus meaning that the US is not the first
point of release.
It's not a big deal, I've been on the list now for several years now and
managed perfectly well. If you want to call them domestic releases instead
of US (fewer key strokes involved, for the lazy umong you:) releases
that's up to you and I can't really force you.
Anyway it was a tiny, wee complaint that didn't even deserve the bandwidth
used up by this message. The most important thing is that we discuss music
and if we all understand each other then what does it matter.
Globally yours
Tim
Those who set out to serve both God and Mammon
soon find there is no God.
obidm: not much in the way of domestic Chilean releases to discuss;)
On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, jeff wrote:
quoted 11 lines The issue arose because apparently the person who posted a set of>
> The issue arose because apparently the person who posted a set of
> release dates comitted the same mistake as the person who innocently
> used the term "domestic". I see no one quick to put him on the firing
> line - as well they shouldn't. It looks as though you could see what the
> American meant, could you not? Is it equally clear what the other person
> specified as to WHERE the record would be released? No. Lighten
> up...what's the big deal?
>
>
>