179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Random Junk
To:
Date:
Thu, 12 Jun 1997 10:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) 12" vs.CDs
Msg-Id:
<199706121728.KAA19815@hudsucker.gamespot.com>
In-Reply-To:
<yam7101.1772.130643584@clark.net>
Mbox:
idm.9706.gz
The Rare Guy writes:
quoted 8 lines On Wednesday, 11-Jun-97, chall@leonardo.net wrote [about (idm) 12" vs.CDs]:> On Wednesday, 11-Jun-97, chall@leonardo.net wrote [about (idm) 12" vs.CDs]: > >Looking at the total popularity of the Gescom work (a bunch of 12" > >records), I begin to wonder why skam doesn't press a CD of the Gesom > >music? I know it would sell. It would also enable a lot of idm > >audience further exposure to some very, very creative music. > > hmm.. I don't know much about running a record label, but somehow I don't > think this will be very profitable, considering the amount of gescom 12"'s..
CDs have a much higher profit margin. vinyl production is expensive and doesn't net you anywhere near the same amount of $. at this point it's actually cheaper to make CDs.
quoted 5 lines Again, I know nothing about running a label, but usually when a label makes> Again, I know nothing about running a label, but usually when a label makes > music available in only one format, there are two reasons why (I think): > > 1) the label doesn't have the money to make it available in all > formats,
probably personally i think it's just the coolness factor. vinyl is neat. but it's a relic and a not very profitable one at that. -- Jon Drukman jsd@gamespot.com SpotMedia Communications ...I was an infinitely hot and dense dot...