179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Date:
Thu, 29 May 1997 21:08:52 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: reznor
Msg-Id:
<970529210843_613297039@emout07.mail.aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.9705.gz
In a message dated 97-05-29 20:22:53 EDT, kevfrey@evansville.net (FreyGuy) writes: << The reason Vibert is (dare I say..) eager in this respect, is because there is bunches o bucks involved for him for associating himself with Renzor's Nothing. He stands to potentially become a millionare.. I wouldn't have a problem with it either... But what Gonzi (and others) are talking about (and I think you know this) is that all the top 40 people who heard "I want to xxxx you like an animal.." on MTV will now associate meester Vibert with meester Reznor (and this Perf.Drug song is worse than that one). Its a simple case of guilty-by-association and tends to extract a little integrity from our,...ahem, underexposed artists that we dig so deeply. That's all.. no real mysteries here. Same syndrome as when meester James was being marketed so heavily with this latest album... just kinda freaks us Americans out a little to see rather silly-music-listening masses buying this sort of tune-age. >> ok. Meat Beat Manifesto, Pop Will Eat Itself, and others have all released music on nothing. none of them have become millonaries here in the states. the majority of the braindead Mtv fans are just too stupid to associate "reznor" with "nothing" :-) The only person to ever become popular on nothing was Marilyn Manson and that was because Trent literally molded him into a Trent, only streching the extremes.