179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
The Rare Guy
To:
IDM
Date:
Fri, 23 May 1997 04:07:13 EST4EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) some clarity(star wars)
Msg-Id:
<yam7082.666.128264064@clark.net>
In-Reply-To:
<v01540b01afaa0e62cdd8@[207.38.248.38]>
Mbox:
idm.9705.gz
On Thursday, 22-May-97, Peter Becker wrote [about (idm) some clarity(star wars)]:
quoted 3 lines Whatever Spooky played at Cloudwatch was *that* , whether he mixed other>Whatever Spooky played at Cloudwatch was *that* , whether he mixed other >things is heresay...I was'nt there. >More likely than not, it was this piece, alone as it has its own beats.
oh it was the 12" in question.. believe me.. spooky didn't mix other things :D, plus another dj in the other room played the same track only moments after spooky dropped it.
quoted 5 lines Consider: assuming that you are humble (when stating IMHO), is'nt>Consider: assuming that you are humble (when stating IMHO), is'nt >everything that you say and write in your opinion? >So often, people write " Aphex Twin, FAX, Marylyn Manson ( or other topics >that *occasionally* make it to IDM) ...IMHO made a great LP or video or >interview."
quoted 1 line Isn't your opinion strong enough to stand on its own 2 feet without the tag?>Isn't your opinion strong enough to stand on its own 2 feet without the tag?
IMHO and IMO are the same thing really. at least i've always thought of them this way, and there doesn't seem to be a reason why anyone uses IMHO over IMO and vice versa. Now, do you know what ROTFL means? :) __ __\ \ / /_\ \ \_____/ , m7=