179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Alex Reynolds
To:
Date:
Tue, 22 Apr 1997 21:56:41 -0400
Subject:
(idm) Re: idm V1 #1074
Msg-Id:
<Pine.SGI.3.95.970422214916.28895B-100000@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<199704222247.PAA17436@hyperreal.com>
Mbox:
idm.9704.gz
On Tue, 22 Apr 1997 idm-digest-owner@hyperreal.com wrote:
quoted 8 lines Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 13:44:05 -0500> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 13:44:05 -0500 > From: "Mark Bowen" <mb@gettins.bche.uic.edu> > Subject: (idm) DJing isn't high art > > Djing is great. I do it. I love to do it and hear it done. Its art in the > sense that collage making is art or flower arranging is art. You aren't > creating much, just rearranging whats already done. Sometime its nice but its > too easy.
Isn't 'original', non-sampled music sourced from rearranged noise? Does this mean that the degree of rearrangement is the only indicator of quality? I don't think it does. I think that the creation itself is the only indicator of its quality, not some arbitrary, subjective evaluation such as 'degree.' It's all noise, after all. Some of it more pleasant than others. Alex