In a message dated 21/04/97 18:09:26, you write:
quoted 3 lines i don't understand you at all. you take a whack at me for not liking> i don't understand you at all. you take a whack at me for not liking
> a wimpy little syrupy jungle record whereas you yourself said not five
> minutes earlier:quoted 1 line piss-poor daytime-radio-friendly jungle (which is where I hear it about> > piss-poor daytime-radio-friendly jungle (which is where I hear it about
10
quoted 1 line times a day), come on, you've got to do better than this..> > times a day), come on, you've got to do better than this.. quoted 1 line daytime-radio-friendly TOTALLY describes "circles".> daytime-radio-friendly TOTALLY describes "circles".
I meant daytime-radio-friendly as in badly produced, house derived cheesy
vocal jungle that makes me want to shit in someone's breakfast it's that bad.
Whether it's hard (which the Chillaz track purports to be) or soft, or
syrupy doesn't matter.
quoted 2 lines wait, let me guess, you're just pissing in the pool cos it's fun and> wait, let me guess, you're just pissing in the pool cos it's fun and
> trendy. damn, you remind me of me, several years ago.
No, not quite. You were there attacking a record (which I've not heard, and
may indeed be crap) simply for being soft and light, which kind of describes
some of the drum'n'bass I like (Bukem, Chameleon) and just to dismiss it as
crap because of this, well it stinks to me, and I thought I'd piss in your
particular pool for a cheap laugh ;-)
Not all jungle has to be jump-up mayhem or techstep cut-up coldness to be
good, in just the same way that all techno doesn't have to be demonic
gabba-esque banging, which is what I gathered you thought from the tone of
your post.
Cheerio!
NP - The Cough - Wishmountain