179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
weindan@vivanet.com
To:
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 2 Apr 1997 16:20:08 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) The Tenor Has No Clothes
Msg-Id:
<Pine.GSO.3.94.970402161947.10264A-100000@shell10>
In-Reply-To:
<970402132839_81530484@emout03.mail.aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.9704.gz
quoted 2 lines were "Sugardaddy," "Caravan" and "Shore>> were "Sugardaddy," "Caravan" and "Shore >> Hotel;" the rest were EZ-listening muzak.
quoted 1 line What's EZ Listening muzak?> What's EZ Listening muzak?
What do you mean "what's EZ-listening muzak"? It's EZ listening muzak you fool! It's self apparent. Gabe/weindan@vivanet.com On Wed, 2 Apr 1997 Humanerr0r@aol.com wrote:
quoted 34 lines In a message dated 02/04/97 15:36:36, you write:> In a message dated 02/04/97 15:36:36, you write: > > > _Intervision_ is not IDM. > > What's IDM? > > > It's lounge music. > > Oh good, normally I have to play music in my bedroom. > > > The only tracks that even marginally qualified as IDM > > Are you the kind of individual who collects together vowels and consonants in > your alphabet soup before you eat them? > > > were "Sugardaddy," "Caravan" and "Shore > > Hotel;" the rest were EZ-listening muzak. > > What's EZ Listening muzak? > > > I'm sorry, but 3 out of 11 > > maketh not an IDM recording, no matter what label it's on. > > Absolutely right - isn't that just wonderful? > > > Why he gets any play on this list at all is totally beyond me. *shrug* > > Jimi Tenor's great, and that's enough of a reason for me. > > Cheerio! > > NP - Edgey - Kape Ill Miester > >