179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Greg Earle
To:
Date:
Sun, 09 Mar 1997 18:22:46 -0800
Subject:
(idm) Re: Pommes Fritz
Msg-Id:
<9703100222.AA20524@isolar.Tujunga.CA.US>
In-Reply-To:
<199703090752.CAA18864@tor-srs1.netcom.ca>
Mbox:
idm.9703.gz
COLDCUTS said:
quoted 6 lines Anyway, IMHO, _PF_ is quite an interesting listen, and has more serious>> Anyway, IMHO, _PF_ is quite an interesting listen, and has more serious >> content than usual for the Orb. Disconcerting, but admirable. > > Of all the electronic artists honing their production skills over the years, > no one IMO has truly gone over that edge of being able to create such > multi-layered masterpieces as Patterson and his cronies...
I'll take FSOL, please.
quoted 4 lines [PF] did have a dark quality with Reverend Jones gibbering and a surreality> [PF] did have a dark quality with Reverend Jones gibbering and a surreality > that didn't go to these lengths in past releases, and this is where Orb > fans split into two factions: those that loved the new direction and those > that couldn't get past the straight ahead trippiness of the earlier output.
Oh, please! I didn't compare "Pommes Fritz" with earlier Orb in my head, I simply listened to it a few times and I still assert that it's mostly aimless noodling, and therefore uninteresting to me. FSOL are sometimes prone to noodling as well, but they do it in such a way that it's mostly interesting to me, so I don't mind it (FSOL's noodling is more like "brapping" to use some Skinny Puppy parlance, an audio collage technique to interconnect pieces in a seamless fashion).
quoted 2 lines (This did indeed seperate the ones who listened to them for its fluffy> (This did indeed seperate the ones who listened to them for its fluffy > aspects with those that appreciated its depth)
I resent the implication that those of us who didn't like "Pommes Fritz" are those who listen to The Orb for their "fluffy aspects".
quoted 4 lines From PF and OT to the production on the Subsurfing's 'The Number> From PF and OT to the production on the Subsurfing's 'The Number > Readers' and FFWD, the multi-dimensional layering and success of > sculpting so many levels AND giving them cohesion has yet to be > surpassed, IMHO.
I still think FSOL blows them (and everybody else) out of the water, IMHO.
quoted 3 lines I still haven't listened to the new album, but I can't wait to get blown> I still haven't listened to the new album, but I can't wait to get blown > away once more, not by listening to it in a pop-sense, but in terms of > 'holographic' sonic construction.
Well, let's see what you think when you discover that "Toxygene" is "the fluffy stuff" (and damn good fluffy stuff it is, too - just saw the video on AMP last night).
quoted 11 lines Anybody can pick up an MC303, effects processors and other gear and> Anybody can pick up an MC303, effects processors and other gear and > twiddle their knobs and get funky sounds ... > > Certain individuals like R.D. James & M. Paradinas tweaking and > programming some really fucked stuff ... but it still tends to be fairly flat > in creation (though excellent none-the-less). > > And then there are those that know what neurological buttons it takes to > push in order to succeed transporting you to a new headspace, and make > you sit still in awe, mouth gaping, trying to take in all this information > that's overwhelming you.
You're joking, right? Have you heard the "Analogue Bubblebath 3" CD? Or "Tango & Vectif"? "Bluff Limbo"? If someone asked me to play them something that fit your bottom-most paragraph, I'd pull out "Bluff Limbo" and play the last track ("Ethereal Murmurings") ... - Greg