179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Cc:
Date:
Sun, 9 Mar 1997 17:25:28 PST
Subject:
(idm) Re: i've not yet said my piece on u2.
Msg-Id:
<19970309.172540.7095.0.tweibrecht@juno.com>
Mbox:
idm.9703.gz
On 09 Mar 1997 21:43:11 GMT Ian_McCausland@mit.bison.mb.ca (Ian McCausland) writes:
quoted 25 lines kysrsoze@dls.net,Internet writes:>kysrsoze@dls.net,Internet writes: >Neither U2, or their producers and their remixers qualify as IDM. You >may want to discuss this stuff on alt.music.techno (I believe) or some >alternative mailing list. If you go there, you won't be flamed or >sworn >at, you'll find people with similar interests, and none of us will >need >to read hundreds of emails about something which is pretty cut and dry >to begin with. > > > > >the facist attitude toward whats "thislisty" or not is starting to >really >piss me off... we all have a common interest,... IDM >what we talk about I think should be a matter of personal freedom... >if >Gloria Estifan teams up with Orbital... or Pat Boone goes JUngle,.. >and I >wanna talk about it.... I will and there is Nuthing you should be able >to do >about it.... > >
exactly... tom w np- u2 - pop