179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
PhilE
To:
Date:
Thu, 27 Feb 1997 13:17:53 +0000
Subject:
Re: (idm) Bump Analog (get it?) (no)
Msg-Id:
<48280331CBE@bagpuss.argonaut.com>
Mbox:
idm.9702.gz
Styrolene vaT <kung.funk@virgin.net> wrote:
quoted 4 lines However i think the likelyhood of just having one box that more> However i think the likelyhood of just having one box that more > than adequately does the lot is about five years or so off yet, > its about as likely as a paperless office. Now if you could > fashion a studio from intelligent utility fog......
Yeah, I was thinking about this a while back, and (after some discussions with real musicians) came to similar conclusions. It's all >technically< possible now, but the interface is a really sticky area. Musicians are too used to physical controls, which for your one-box studio, means you'll need some configurable controllers. The proposals for DirectInput provide an API to do this, but I digress. What's lacking is the will to do all this. Can you see AKAI making their nice profitable samplers obsolete, and entering the software market instead? Maybe Steinberg, but it'll cost a fortune, and be pirated on an enormous scale, so we'll all get to play with it. Well, here's hoping. Phil PS ObIDM: How were Autechre & the Surgeon @ the Blue Note? I missed it due to obligations at work. ...I feel laaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAve...