179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Andy
To:
Date:
Mon, 27 Jan 1997 01:14:52 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
(idm) IDM videos and swirly colors
Msg-Id:
<Pine.GSO.3.95.970127011332.4477A-100000@mail.wesleyan.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9701.gz
regarding AMP etc... AFX's "On" was great, however, I was overwhelmed by the number of semi-boring screen-saveresque videos. (unfortunatley similar to the AII Motion video with endlessly repetitive animation). What are the other AFX videos like? Anyone care to venture why so many "idm-ambient" vidoes are, well, somewhat comparable to looking through a kallidescope(which for me only retains my interest for less than 1min). I suppose they are attempts at visual manifestations of the sensations the music is supposed to create? Or maybe becuase they are really nice to look at if you are on some tye of chemical? Granted, these "computer generated" and swirly images(i.e. Kairo(STC), the Sun Electric video etc ad nauseum) could be excellent on a large scren in a club or at a live performance, with the music enveloping you, but, well, they seemingly lacked creativity while watching them in my bedroom on my TV. The whole idea seemed kinda trite. What medium/audience are most of these videos originally made for? Are they intended for homeviewers in Europe of for big "visual presentations" with live performances? I suppose it varies. I'll take Autechre's Second Bad Vibel, AFX's On or even The Box over the redundant screen-saver stuff anyday. What about everyone else? WHy does this genre of swrily colors persist? I'm bored with it. andy, late at night, listening to ALec Empire