179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Brian J Tang (The Freshmaker)
To:
Date:
Thu, 9 Jan 1997 18:28:37 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) IDM
Msg-Id:
<199701092327.AA07733@ougou.devo.ilx.com>
Mbox:
idm.9701.gz
Intelligent is a term that we apply to our music, because we're all anal about the level of hipness it gives us for micro-pigeonholing our music. That's my reason at least.
quoted 28 lines Here are some obnoxiously biased opinions, fools to the fire:> Here are some obnoxiously biased opinions, fools to the fire: > > 1. My impression of the term "intelligent dance music" is that the music > should appeal to one's mind in addition to one's senses. That is, involve > the consciousness at all levels. Therefore, the _creation_ of the music > generally also involves the consciousness at all levels. Perhaps > "rational" (vs. sensual) or "intellectual" dance music might be better, as > it avoids the value judgement inherent. There is, after all, good dance > music not classified as idm. Such as Latin jazz. > > Nonintelligent dance music simply involves the same pleasure senses that > like ice cream. > > Pop music only involves that part of the mind which stores advertising > jingles for all eternity. > > 2. Another possible axis of the intelligent/nonintelligent dance music > divide, which breaks things down a bit differently, is the real/kitsch > factor. Intelligent music is then defined as that which expresses > something real and authentic (difficult terms in themselves to define), > while nonintelligent is comprised of rather simplistic cliches. > > > Zenon M. Feszczak > Philosopher ex nihilo > > >
(*) Fresh and Full of Life Brian Tang NYC http://silly.com/~tang