179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Matt Jarsky
To:
,
Date:
Mon, 6 Jan 1997 15:01:11 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) pissed off in 97
Msg-Id:
<85256418:0070344A.00@NRGNT1.GraphicNRG.com>
Mbox:
idm.9701.gz
polygon@jhu.edu wrote: I voted for Skam as best label, but Orbital's In Sides as best album ofthe year?! Orbital?! Argh, I'm trying not to vomit in disgust. I boughtthe album, listened to it, and passed it off for what it was: MTV breakthrough/quick-burn fodder which we're all quickly getting sick of, hopefully. Christ. Yet another example of the undue and undeserved influence we're letting MTV have on musical tastes. Show some free will, people, for God's sakes. Making an effort?!!! MTV?! I, and no doubt there are many like me, am regularly in the stores listening to the new releases, hoping to come accross some really wild, really good music. I listen to names both familiar and unfamiliar and the stores where I shop stock most of the items discussed on this list. My pursuit of the good groove is an active one. My selection of Orbital as #1 was not by default and not the result an apathetic "Oh well, they're the only band in the poll I've heard of." (Oops, dangling participle.) I don't get MTV or its Canadian equivalent MuchMusic and even if I did...well you don't see Alanis Morisette in my collection and everyone seen one of her damn videos. (Actually, maybe I like Orbital because I've seen an Alanis video, they're all part of the same megacorporate conspiracy, after all.) It is just a poll and the results will always be affected by an album's popularity as well as its quality. In theory, a mediocre album can win if it's the only album a big enough majority has heard. But in the case of In Sides, and this is no slight to the other artists nominated, we have the combination of quantity AND quality. all for now, magic hands