179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Ashok Divakaran
To:
Date:
Mon, 30 Dec 1996 15:34:23 +0000 (GMT)
Subject:
RE: (idm) idm archives.
Msg-Id:
<"E622ZWQIIEJVU*/R=WBWASH/R=A1/U=ASHOK DIVAKARAN/"@MHS>
In-Reply-To:
<32C7A2AC.EFB@linkonline.net>
Mbox:
idm.9612.gz
quoted 12 lines While having a look through the July IDM archives to try and dig up some> While having a look through the July IDM archives to try and dig up some > info (yes, at 3am...you never know when the urge will strike you) I came > across this posted by Todd Roberts the editor or Urb: > > > As far as I'm concerned, and from what I've seen here on this list, you guys > > are for the most part, a pedantic bunch of train-spotting wankers -- > > anxious to get info on the next shit but with little regard for quality or > > musical perspective. > > Haha. Right on the money. Wonder how he even got a chance to look at the > list, he's probably always so busy with those fashion spreads and dick > sucking interviews with house dj's.
Todd Roberts is certainly right about the lack of musical perspective - your ceaseless self-righteous posts only confirm that. At least mags like Muzik and Urb make an effort to cover dance and club culture in all its forms and let the reader decide what and what not to read. I'd much rather have it that way than have to read blinkered idm-only elitist snot like this. There are more than a few of us whose tastes extend beyond Rephlex and Warp, and continual and pointless assaults like this get really annoying after a while. Sorry for the vitriol, here's to a little more open-mindedness for '97. Ashok