I've probably said this before, but I honestly don't understand why so
many listeners have such a problem with LFO's _Advance_. It doesn't
resemble the 1st album at all -- but years later why should it? _Advance_
is finely-crafted and engaging, but close attention and/or repeated
listenings may help.
Is _Advance_ too demanding, abstract, or harsh for the tastes of
listmembers? Please enlighten me.
The best bargain, if you can find it, is probably the "We are Back"/"LFO"
single on Tommy Boy.
--Mark
__ <
http://www.xnet.com/~mkolmar/BurningRome> ==> MPEG audio clips <==
M U S I C : W E B : S O U N D D E S I G N : H T M L : C G I : E T C
"The fact their parents have separated doesn't disturb the children.
They go on looking at television. How old should they be before they
smoke marijuana? No one seems to know." (John Cage)
On Thu, 10 Oct 1996, Blipvert wrote:
quoted 7 lines The impression here seems to be that the Advance album is not worthwhile.
> The impression here seems to be that the Advance album is not worthwhile.
> What is the opinion of people who liked the first LFO album? I was going
> to buy Advance but I want some opinions before spending the mney on an
> import. After all, I could buy other imoports instead.
>
> Steve
>