179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
J. Martin
To:
Aaron Michelson
Cc:
Brock Suter ,
Date:
Wed, 2 Oct 1996 00:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
(idm) Body music...
Msg-Id:
<Pine.OSF.3.95.961001235127.26045B-100000@becker2.u.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.BSF.3.91.961001190321.9794A-100000@zap.io.org>
Mbox:
idm.9610.gz
On Tue, 1 Oct 1996, Aaron Michelson wrote:
quoted 3 lines Do you really think that> Do you really think that > people who don't dance don't appreciate the music? I think that's a > profoundly absurd question. It does however raise an interesting issue.
There's some music that can be appreciated without dancing, and some that's hard to. I think people can appreciate ambient music (or purely harmonic music, like some Western classical music) without any physical involvement. It's head music. On the other hand, a raw, jacking 909 track is going to sound pretty monotonous and jarring without the physical involvement which turns it into a full-body rhythmic experience -- body music. Same with most pure drumming; the repetition involved is boring on a mental level but exhilarting to move to. Most everything is somewhere between those two extremes. People can appreciate things in different ways. The developing sounds and textures of a good minimal track can be experienced as a mental timbral journey or a physical journey through subtly changing rhythm and movement. Neither one is a less valid form of "appreciation". Hmm, but then again, I guess jacking 909 tracks aren't "intelligent"... ;) JM