179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
g3
To:
Date:
Fri, 09 Aug 1996 10:28:35 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Warp/RePHLeX tyranny explained
Msg-Id:
<320af273.84112472@relay-1.mail.inta.net>
In-Reply-To:
<MAPI.Id.0016.00616d65737320203230413030303034@MAPI.to.RFC822>
Mbox:
idm.9608.gz
On Thu, 08 Aug 96 18:41:29 +0100 (BST), you wrote:
quoted 9 lines It is simulataneously annoying and flattering that people seem to>> It is simulataneously annoying and flattering that people seem to >> talk >> solely about Warp/Rephlex. > >Greg, you are in the interesting (and unique in present company) position of >being formerly a fan, and now an employee of WARP. A year ago you wouldn't >have been in the position to even make that statement, or at least not the >"flattering" part, and as the unofficial WARP discographer, surely WARP was >not an "annoying" subject.?
Course it's not annoying, WARP is ace! :) But in the same way that eating Doubledeckers all day is bad for you so is listening only to Warp/Rephlex. You'd never discover how good Fruits of the Forest Soleros are. ... there is a danger that people will brainwashed into thinking Warp/Rephlex is good - whether they *really* like the music or not, in the same way that the Radio 1 / Musik / Mixmag triopoly brainwash people into buying Perfecto/Chemical Bros/Leftfield/Underworld/Goldie, simply because everyone they seem to talk about nothing else. g.