179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
g3
To:
Date:
Thu, 08 Aug 1996 14:23:28 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Warp/RePHLeX tyranny explained
Msg-Id:
<3209f624.19512216@relay-1.mail.inta.net>
In-Reply-To:
<MAPI.Id.0016.00616d65737320204533394230303134@MAPI.to.RFC822>
Mbox:
idm.9608.gz
On Thu, 08 Aug 96 14:14:13 +0100 (BST), you wrote:
quoted 6 lines Good points which make sense. However there are 2 points which you omit,>Good points which make sense. However there are 2 points which you omit, >both of which are significant at least from a historical point of view. > >1. As I understand it, Alan was originally going to set up an Aphex Twin list >until he decided to expand its scope. As you know The Aphex Twin records >primarily for Rephlex (he half owns it) and er... Warp.
True.
quoted 5 lines 2. The list's name is derived from the "Artificial Intelligence" moniker>2. The list's name is derived from the "Artificial Intelligence" moniker >invented by WARP. See the idm intro piece for further info. >So in effect Rephlex and WARP between them effectively define the subject >matter of the list, and in fact the list would not exist in the form we = >know it were it not for them.
Ack ack No NO!! This is probably the most misunderstood thing about Warp. All Artificial Intelligence refered to was the computer/electronic nature of the music. It had ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with the alleged "intelligence" of the music. Alas and alack AI became synonymous with the so-called intelligent techno movement. It is simulataneously annoying and flattering that people seem to talk solely about Warp/Rephlex. g.