179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Eric Frans
To:
idm
Date:
Tue, 6 Aug 1996 01:38:30 -0700 (MST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) sickness/recovery netcast? or not?
Msg-Id:
<Pine.ULT.3.94.960806013321.20707B-100000@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<v03007803ae2c517ed389@[206.79.132.104]>
Mbox:
idm.9608.gz
On Mon, 5 Aug 1996, Jon Drukman wrote: } At 5:03 PM -0700 8/5/96, Eric Frans wrote: } >Well I'm assuming g3 means keep the Real Audio installed. If that's what } >he means then I agree with him. Don't let postponed Real Audio events } >keep you from enjoying other sites that have things up and running. Real } >Audio allows you to listen to entire songs, concerts, interviews, etc. } >The sound quality is a little "grainy" at times and there is the } >occasional drop-out, but these drawbacks are definitely offset by all the } >bonuses - no more annoying short sound bites, you can check out other } >sites while you listen to audio from another site, the audio can be set to } >be "streaming" so you don't have to wait forever for the music to } >download, etc. } } i really hate realaudio. } 1) it sounds like garbage. } 2) the compression technology is proprietary. } } streamworks totally wipes it from a technical/sound quality perspective. } however, xing's marketing department is pathetic.. hence realaudio, like } microsoft and vhs, reigns supreme. *sigh* } } with all that said, check out: } } http://www.cyborganic.com/people/jsd/sounds/nosmoking.ram } } for my latest piece of drum 'n' bass kittens, rendered in grainy 28.8 } realaudio. :) Streamworks definitely has better quality when there is quality. There seems to be a _lot_ more drop-outs when using Streamworks IMO compared to Real Audio. Is the Streamworks encoder free? I would check out your music but I have only a 14.4 modem. Any chance for you to add that format as well? /\/\/\/\/\ /\/\/\/\/\ / / / / / / E r i c F r a n s \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ franse@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu / / / / / / \/\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/