179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Dave Walker
To:
IDM List
Date:
2 Jul 96 10:55:02 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) In defense of Jeff Mills
Msg-Id:
<ADFEB099-7344A@198.108.17.62>
Mbox:
idm.9607.gz
Miles Egan said: :It would if I made the rules. I'm not qualified to criticize Mills on :technical grounds. I just think it's lazy and unneccesary to use such :boring rhythms. The sky is the limit with a drum machine and a good :sequencer. Why not use the tools? Um, weren't we talking about a DJ set here? A fair bit of space was spent in the Jockey Slut interview on the tightrope a DJ walks between moving the punters and pure exploration. Check out the Mills back cat. and you'll find quite a bit of stuff outside of 4OTF. Ah well, here's to diversity of opinions. As the "straight beats or not" debate tends to run distressingly close to religion, I'll refrain from dragging it out any further (damned Hugenots!) I'll just end here by saying that in the context of DJs playing straight techno (no chaser), Mills comes closer to "getting it" (i.e. working out the implications of making and spinning the "Movable Parts" of modular music) than anyone else I've seen work a pair (or trio) of SL-1200's. In the immortal words of Tomi Koskinen, if it kick it kick, period. -d.w. on now: "Joe 90" - Claude Young & Ian O'Brien